I turn 40 in tomorrow and I’ve more or less been 100% devoted to physics since I was 20 (2nd year uni). It’s been a journey with some highs and a couple of very serious lows. Motivated by this recent excellent post on self-care & overwork in academia, I spent some time looking back and thinking about what would I go back and tell my 20 year old self (aside from get your B.Sc. and then go get a real job, one with good prospects & good money) or others at the same stage, e.g., the 2nd year lab students I taught this year. Some are things I’ve learned and managed to incorporate, some are things that I still fail at despite repeated attempts…

1. Put up walls: Despite having an excellent role model for this over much of my career, I still haven’t learned to put up walls to keep work from infringing on life. If you don’t, work will consume you 24/7 and then destroy you (trust me, I’ve been there several times). Sit down and work out a clear plan for when you will work and when you won’t work. When you aren’t working, then do not do any work at all, full stop. Be disciplined about it. Working hard is one thing, working 24/7 is slavery. We should not be admiring workaholics (and I’ve been one), they just destroy the system for everyone by helping step up an insane arms race.

2. Exercise is not negotiable: This one I did learn, but only after several health issues and reaching 80+ kg in weight (BMI = 28). Doesn’t matter what it is, find something, and make sure you get at least a half-hour’s exercise a day, 6 days a week. It’s good for the black dog, it’s good for your health, and it’s good for your ‘romantic agenda’ 😉 . It also makes you massively more effective at work.

3. Eat well most of the time, splurge occasionally: Comes part and parcel of the point above, exercise is pointless if you eat truckloads of garbage. That said, you need to enjoy life too. If you mostly eat really good, the odd splurge won’t matter, in fact, it is even better when its a rare treat.

4. Find ways to manage your stress safely: A career in science is going to be stressful, there’s no two ways about it. It will be worse if you let it make you work all the time. Follow Rule 1, and then make sure you have good safe outlets for the stress. Bottling it up is bad and you can’t hide it, it just always leaks out and puts people offside with you. Drugs and alcohol are not the solution either, even though they might fool you and seem so on the short term. If your drug & alcohol use gets beyond being social, start asking yourself hard questions fast.

5. Choose the right people to work with: Only work with people who a) you enjoy working with, and b) are good enough that you can get things done. This should be an AND gate not an OR gate. Working with people you like but can’t get anything done with just isn’t effective. Working with people who are good but you don’t like is a disaster in the waiting. The corollary here is: Don’t work with arseholes no matter how good they are; being good is not justification enough to work with someone.

6. Make sure you have anti- role models too: Lots of people talk about mentors and role models, few talk about the exact opposite. Look carefully, many people who on the surface look respected by the community and highly successful are held in absolute contempt by the people who work with or for them. Watch carefully, they are everywhere. Do what ever you can to not become like them; they will teach you more lessons than any positive role-model or mentor ever can. Just because someone has outstanding research metrics, doesn’t mean they’re worthy of your respect. Great people are worthy of respect, some of them also have great research metrics, some don’t.

7. Be an all-rounder: A true academic/professor cares about all parts of the job, not just the research. Put effort into your teaching, public engagement and admin tasks, no matter how much it seems your employer only values you for your research metrics alone. You will be far happier for it because you will feel valued even when your research career is at a low point (these inevitably come sometimes). The appreciation of your students or the public is worth far more than any accolade or paper. If all you do is work to receive attention from elitists and the little ‘old boys clubs’ they create, you are bound for a life of unhappiness.

8. Cultivate a life outside: Make sure you take time to have a life outside of science, and that means a full one not a hollow one. Have friends outside academia, have hobbies outside academia, take your holidays and go places. Don’t let the workload take these things away from you. In fact, do quite the opposite, let people inside science see that you have this separate life and sometimes let them be a part of it. This is the only way we will change the toxic workaholic culture that some have forced upon us by their willingness to sacrifice all for their research career. Respect people for working less and having a life rather than working all the time and reinforcing a toxic environment.

9. Don’t work insane hours: The odd all-nighter is ok when it’s desperately needed, some of my best lab work has been done at 3am, but never let it become a habit. If you are working between midnight and 6am it should be for something truly worth doing and requiring it, e.g., being in the lab on a crucial experiment, working to a funding proposal deadline, if it’s just menial crap like e-mail, then go to bed immediately, no excuses. Politely tell off your colleagues if they are e-mailing you between midnight and 6am (and are in your timezone).

10. Value people for who they are, not what they achieve: Some academics only want to talk to the other ‘serious players’ in their field, or people who have something to offer them, and everyone else isn’t worth the time of day. This is a horrible way to approach life, sadly you will meet these people time and again. Talk to people because they are nice, not because they are good. Talk to students and postdocs, they are almost inevitably nice people who haven’t yet been messed up by the elitist arseholes that pervade science. Value the colleagues you get to work with who are decent people. Be nice to the tech staff and admin staff and even the cleaners — they have hard jobs too. Treat all your undergraduate students with friendly respect no matter how good their grades are. They’re all there to learn, some have it easier than others.

11. Define success correctly: If you stay in science long enough, you’ll realise they system defines success all wrong. The system tries to convince you that it’s all about your h-index, Nature & Science papers and grant income. Success is having a good life, getting to do the science you enjoy alongside it, whilst also passing on your knowledge to the next generation. Some people will be fortunate enough to get good research metrics while doing this, some won’t. The people who have good metrics but gave up the rest of their life to get them are not a success.

12. Science is an extreme sport, take risks: Always remember the words of a friend of mine: “There’s no shortage of work for smart, adaptable people.” Too many people in science are too conservative in my view, mostly driven by a very risk averse funding agencies (there are a few exceptions, though none in Australia sadly). If you aren’t pushing yourself outside your comfort zone then what’s the point of working this hard? There’s no excitement in just doing the same old crap, year after year, to keep up a continuous stream of papers, as many do. Just ask Matthew McConaughey about his endless string of rom-coms… Too many professors just keep submitting the same old grant, which inevitably gets funded, so they can just keep doing the same old science — I have zero respect for them. Challenge yourself with new materials, new collaborations, new ideas, new teams. This might end your career, if so, then so be it. Better to live fast and die young than be square. Respect adventure more than metrics.

And as a bonus, since I always like to break the rules…

13. Try to give more than you take: There’s too much focus in science on only doing the things that directly benefit you. Arsehole referees say things like “the applicant has too many papers where he’s neither first nor last author, I’m ignoring these as clearly they are negligible contributions” (real review on one of my grant proposals); people will squabble over authorship and control of projects as a result, some will even shaft one another. You will meet people who will shirk their refereeing responsibilities or admin responsibilities or other responsibilities to try and get ahead. Forget this, because if you behave just like this, you are part of perpetuating the toxic culture of science rather than fixing it. Give your all to all you can (subject to Rule 1 of course), help more junior colleagues as much as possible, they are the future. Just generally chip in when you can. The world of science only gets better if more of us do this. Trying to out-bastard the bastards just makes the world worse.

42 responses to “12 guidelines for surviving science…”

  1. Number 12….let your innovation and creativity shine in ways not supported by the current system. Sure, you may only get confused looks and vague pats on the head from the Academic Establishment…but at least you can sleep at night, knowing you’re doing something that inspires others to take risks! Great post, Adam. See you for Mocktails in Feb? 😉

  2. Great post, may I share this? Found from a tweet on twitter. I like what you say, and I think a few of my friends would appreciate this blog post.

    1. Sure, share as much as you like.

  3. You are not alone you may like this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tz0bC_4_xLo

  4. Very nice post – thanks. But all easier said than done I’ll bet!

  5. Great post, I really enjoyed it and I hope lots of younger scientists read it. I was interested to also read the article you mentioned in the first paragraph, but it appears the link is broken. Can you provide a new link or suggest what to search for please? Thanks!

  6. So true! I will print these rules out and hang them up for everyone in our lab to read. 🙂

  7. Reblogged this on memoirs of a research assistant and commented:
    Great read! Though number 2 seems like… uh… okay okay I will start exercising!

    Have a great week ahead scientists!

  8. I should have thought about some of these points earlier on. Never too late to learn! Hope you don’t mind me linking to this post from my blog. These 12 (13) points inspired my latest posting.

    1. Thanks for linking, spread the message far and wide.

  9. Reblogged this on In the Dark and commented:
    I’ve been very busy today, mainly travelling, so haven’t had timetable do a proper post, but I saw this earlier and thought I would pass it on to my avid readers. I don’t manage as many of these as I should, but hopefully you will do better!

    1. Cancer biologist, same age, same observations. Spot on! In Australia #5 is the problem, so limited for choice. Nice work!

  10. […] Ebola lapses show lab safety protocols should factor in human error Caffeine improves reaction time, vigilance and logical reasoning during extended periods with restricted opportunities for sleep. (though n = 23 atypical people) By ‘Editing’ Plant Genes, Companies Avoid Regulation Don’t be a dummy: New Year’s ‘detoxes’ are a waste of time 12 guidelines for surviving science… […]

  11. Thanks for the nice lessons…

  12. A great post, thanks. I found myself agreeing with every one – it’s always reassuring to know you’re not alone in thinking these things!

  13. […] 12 (really 13) Guidelines for Surviving Science. These are great! #5 reminds me of a conversation I had with someone about choosing mentors and collaborators: Imagine a 2 x 2 grid where you have nice/not nice on one side and smart/not smart on the other. Aim for nice & smart. Avoid the quadrant of doom. […]

  14. Very nice advice! And it complements perfectly a post in my own blog: https://marcoarmello.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/newbies/

  15. naive estimate Avatar
    naive estimate

    You’ve hit 13 nails right on the head!

  16. […] Most of the stuff I did this last week falls under Academic Citizenship, which the Times Higher Education magazine describes as the invisible glue that holds higher education together. Yesterday, I read a fabulous blog by Adam Micolich, on science career advice. It’s mainly about how to be good academic citizen. […]

  17. You’ve left out “be friends with staff, who are also your colleagues”. Often they’re quite as accomplished as you are at whatever it is they do; some of them are in fact scientists; many of them also teach, present, do outreach work. Many of them know the students, sometimes better than you do. Some have PhDs, some don’t, but by middle age an extra three years’ school/servitude and a very long paper you know was beginner work doesn’t look all that impressive. Do your bit to do away with a caste system in your department, and you’ll live in a happier and likely more interesting place.

    1. Sounds like a comment from close to home… perhaps? People who seem unfriendly are not always unfriendly by intent, often shyness, oppressive stress and feeling like an outsider in their own environment (I always have been) just makes them appear that way. Some are introverts (common in science). Sometimes they just need someone else to break the ice. Academia is a weird beast, the cut-throat politics and institutional obsession with elitism is such that it’s easy to feel permanently under threat and unable to relax anywhere near the work environment. Such people are often entirely different on the outside…

      Good point though, and duly noted.

  18. Excellent post. Your funding feedback particularly resonates with me. See http://bit.ly/1SfieFD. I have received very similar crapback (I don’t call it feedback as it isn’t, feedback should inform) on two applications.

    The one point I would challenge in this post regards putting time and energy into administration. Whilst some administration is necessary we should be challenging universities and funders to reduce or optimise administration as far to often it’s almost administration for the sake of administration.

  19. […] second inspiring blog was Adam Micolich’s: 12 Guidelines for Surviving Science  which included Step 6: “Make sure you have anti-role models too”. Its an idea I’ve never […]

  20. 10. Holy shit I wish you were at my university. Bunch of elitist dicks who only cared about you if they liked you which meant only if you were some supergenius. I was the only woman who made it in that pisshole because of the lack of support and constant trying to kick people out of the program. Those professors can suck my hypothetical dick!

  21. […] by a recent blog post 12 very wise guidelines for surviving science in which @ad_mico reflects on some of his career to date “The applicant has too many papers where […]

  22. […] buried in every role model is an anti role model; in every example to follow an example not to follow. This is the human condition — we are […]

  23. Excellent post! You’ve put in a nutshell what makes for a good life anywhere, not just in science! Especially love point number 2!

  24. […] May 15, 2017 – By googletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1498138615147-0'); }); Fashion designers, world leaders, chief executives and academics have long recognised the importance of sabbaticals of varying duration (normally weeks to a year) to provide clarity of thought. However, before their first sabbatical, I doubt any of them could truly gauge the profound impact it would have on them. As I prepared for my sabbatical, (currently in New Zealand on month 4 of 6) sure, I expected to get more done without the daily demands of teaching and administration. What I did not expect was that the sabbatical would draw out creativity and ideas like I had never had before and that a sabbatical could be the foundation for a lifetime of meaningful work.   I have kept a file on my laptop called ‘Generic Educational Pieces’ since around 2010. In this folder are book quotes, blog posts, videos and newspaper articles that usually identify the values I believe are central to a life well-lived. Sometimes in more broad conversations with students, I reach into this file to share some gathered wisdom. My time on sabbatical has reminded me, almost incessantly at times, about the importance of these values. I guess a sabbatical provides the time to solidify a philosophy and write it down. These are 10 things I think it is important for an academic to develop; although they can be applied to many people in many professions with some thought:   1) Meaning: In the words of Alex Soojung-Kim Pang, it is worth thinking about your ‘work’ and also ‘your life’s work’. Work reflects a set of demands made of you from an external source. Your ‘life’s work’ refers to a set of tasks you’ve determined based on the meaning they hold for you. Understanding the difference is the first step to developing strategies to maximise time spent on meaningful work. For an academic, it may be the realisation that they can in fact give up doing the science they realised they had little interest in some time ago. Often, academics and people in general continue down the path of least resistance, unsure of what else to do, which raises the issue of mentorship (See Point 7).   2) Autonomy: Linked to the last point, once you have identified meaning, a sabbatical provides complete autonomy for you to start to put the building blocks in place for your ‘life’s work’. Autonomy is a corner-stone of life satisfaction. Workers who are overly constrained in the decisions they are allowed to make tend to be less satisfied than those with greater freedom.   3) Mastery: Away from the pressure cooker of your familiar life, with meaning established and autonomy plentiful, you can take your time. After all, no-one really wants their life’s work to be rushed. The focus becomes about quality not quantity.   4) Satisfaction: Research suggests and I can attest, points 1, 2 and 3 increase satisfaction. People are happier when they spend more time engaged in self-determined activities they want to pursue and less time fulfilling demands from external sources.   5) Deliberate Rest & Creativity: Much has been made of the 10,000 hours of practice required to become ‘elite’ in a chosen field. Psychologists with an interest in skill acquisition will tell you that it is not just practice but ‘deliberate practice’; in other words, the quality of your practice (see point 3). Often overlooked is what the ‘elite’ do when they are not practicing. A more accurate representation of the process would include the hours of rest and sleep required. Some of the most profound scientists of our time worked early and for no more than 4-6 hours per day before taking long walks to set the creative part of their brain free. On sabbatical, I have experienced this intense creativity which initially is overwhelming and can give you trouble sleeping. A routine to harness it and master it before it masters you is key. Allow some time to switch off before bed.   6) Self-control: Self-control is needed more than ever in academia and the wider world. A system that rewards quantity over quality can make it more difficult to do good science, journalism or anything worthwhile. A high stress environment means we are more likely to spend time engaging the primitive part of our brain too much and the rational part, not enough. This doesn’t just have consequences for our ability to delay gratification in pursuit of good science, it also has consequences for how we treat one another. Reactions to the actions of a colleague can be overly emotional and reviews of others work overly critical when we are in a competitive environment that holds little meaning (see point 1) except competition for competition’s sake. Too much meaningless work, a perceived loss of autonomy (due to trying to keep up) and less opportunity for mastery fuels a toxic culture. Understanding the behaviours of others and the brain’s role in driving them can help you exert greater control over your own behaviour.Aspiring leaders must master self-control.   7) Graduates and junior staff: Spending time with these people is perhaps one of the only ways of removing fuel from the fires of academia. A sabbatical allows you time to eat lunch with and hear the concerns of early career researchers. They’re at a crossroads where they sense their meaning might be beginning to drift in a sea of competition and the chasm of the power differential between them and their superiors. You can throw them a life raft – ‘no, you don’t have to destroy that paper because the last reviewer destroyed yours’. They’re nice people, often have had interesting lives before academia and they’re grateful for your time in encouraging them to consider point 1 and point 6 from their perspective and that of others.   8) A critical eye: Not so much for research papers, academics have that already. A sabbatical allows you to obtain a clear view of the University environment and the higher education system you are part of. Of course, to borrow an overused cliché; it’s good to see how they do things somewhere else. However, you might be surprised to find the same daily dose of academia. I tend to learn most from one or two individuals within a University (those who have already considered points 1 – 7) rather than a University itself. The problems with your current work environment will reflect a glare so bright it will almost blind you (watch out and see point 6).   9) A Philosophy: The points I have summarised above come not from the pursuit of my chosen subject specialism but from having the time or more importantly ‘head-space’ to read books from some of the greatest minds outside of my field. These books help you develop a philosophy that becomes the glue between points 1 – 6, the thing you share in point 7 and how you solve some of the problems you see in point 8. Reading outside of your field reaffirms the need for collaborative work. The magnitude of the question developed in point 1 should make you realise you can’t possibly answer it alone.   10) A Reflective Capacity: The doctorate of philosophy teaches us to reflect on why things are the way they are in a very narrow field. Often missed is the need for reflection in relation to the bigger picture. The ability to reflect on our behaviour, values, science, university environment and that of others, will play a significant role in our success or otherwise. Points 1 – 9 require significant reflection. To some, reflection is innate, others must work very hard for the same enlightenment. The point is that we all need it.   If you guys are interested in any of the sources cited in Peter’s article, here’s a list of references:   1. Kalanithi P, Verghese A. When breath becomes air. Random House; 2016. 2. Soojung-Kim Pang A. Rest: Why You Get More Done When You Work Less. Basic Books; 2016. 3. Martinez R. Creating Freedom: Power, Control and the Fight for Our Future. Canongate Books; 2016. 4. Sternberg R. Career Advice From an Oldish Not-Quite Geezer. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://www.chronicle.com/article/Career-Advice-From-an-Oldish/2303352015. 5. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan; 2011. 6. Ericsson KA. The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games. Psychology Press; 2014. 7. Kiely J. Periodization paradigms in the 21st century: evidence-led or tradition-driven? Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2012;7(3):242-250. 8. Mischel W. The marshmallow test: understanding self-control and how to master it. Random House; 2014. 9. Alm D. An Elite State of Mind: Learning Humility from the Fastest Runners in the World. Running Times. http://www.runnersworld.com/race-training/an-elite-state-of-mind: Runner’s World; 2013. 10. Lovell J. George Saunders’s Advice to Graduates. The 6th Floor Eavesdropping on the Times Magazine. https://6thfloor.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/07/31/george-saunderss-advice-to-graduates/?_r=0: The New York Times; 2013. 11. Micolich A. 12 Guidelines for Surviving Science. Fear and Loathing in Academia: A savage journey to the heart of the academic dream. https://pacificsoutheast.wordpress.com/2015/01/02/12-guidelines-for-surviving-science/2015. […]

  25. Reblogged this on Sobrevivendo na Ciência and commented:
    “Talk to people because they are nice, not because they are good. “

  26. […] de tudo, não valorize as pessoas apenas pelo que elas produzem, mas também por como elas tratam os […]

  27. Victor Sandyawan Avatar
    Victor Sandyawan

    I am really glad to find this! Thank you!

Leave a comment

Trending